On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:20:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 09:58 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > - The -minimum- granularity of pass-through is not always a single > > device and not always under SW control > > But IMHO, we need to preserve the granularity of exposing a device to a > guest as a single device. That might mean some devices are held hostage > by an agent on the host. Thats true. There is a difference between unassign a group from the host and make single devices in that PE visible to the guest. But we need to make sure that no device in a PE is used by the host while at least one device is assigned to a guest. Unlike the other proposals to handle this in libvirt, I think this belongs into the kernel. Doing this in userspace may break the entire system if done wrong. For example, if one device from e PE is assigned to a guest while another one is not unbound from its host driver, the driver may get very confused when DMA just stops working. This may crash the entire system or lead to silent data corruption in the guest. The behavior is basically undefined then. The kernel must not not allow that. Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
