Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Introduce QEMU_NEW()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/25/2011 06:21 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 07/25/11 17:20, Avi Kivity wrote:
>  On 07/25/2011 06:17 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>  Using the commands consistently does have an impact, and at least with
>>  qemu_malloc() it is obvious what they are and how they behave. The
>>  proposed macros on the other hand requires everybody to go look up the
>>  macro to find out what it is trying to do.
>
>  That's true for every single function and macro that qemu defines.
>

Of course, and every time it adds complexity for reading it. In this
particular case it seems to simply make the code worse for no gain.

I guess type safety doesn't matter to you.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux