On 07/25/2011 10:10 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 07/25/11 12:06, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
+#define QEMU_NEW(type) ((type *)(qemu_malloc(sizeof(type))))
+#define QEMU_NEWZ(type) ((type *)(qemu_mallocz(sizeof(type))))
Does this mean we need to duplicate the type name for each allocation?
struct foo *f;
...
f = qemu_malloc(sizeof(*f));
Becomes:
struct foo *f;
...
f = QEMU_NEW(struct foo);
If you ever change the name of the type you have to search-replace
these instances. The idomatic C way works well, I don't see a reason
to use QEMU_NEW().
You're right, and it will promote even more abuse of the ugly typedefs.
This really makes the code less readable, especially for outsiders :(
I don't think it really matters either way. If some people prefer to
use g_new(struct foo, 1) vs. g_malloc(sizeof(*f)), I don't think it
significantly impacts overall code readability.
But having nice, documentation for key internal APIs does which is why
using the glib interfaces makes sense IMHO.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
