Re: virtio scsi host draft specification, v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/29/2011 12:03 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>  I agree here, in fact I misread Hannes's comment as "if a driver
>  uses more than one queue it is responsibility of the driver to
>  ensure strict request ordering".  If you send requests to different
>  queues, you know that those requests are independent.  I don't think
>  anything else is feasible in the virtio framework.

That doesn't really fit very well with the SAM model.  If we want
to use multiple queues for a single LUN it has to be transparent to
the SCSI command stream.  Then again I don't quite see the use for
that anyway.

Agreed, I see a use for multiple queues (MSI-X), but not for multiple queues shared by a single LUN.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux