Re: virtio scsi host draft specification, v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/12/2011 09:51 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
>  If a device uses more than one queue it is the responsibility of the
>  device to ensure strict request ordering.
Maybe I misunderstand - how can this be the responsibility of
the device if the device does not get the information about
the original ordering of the requests?

For example, if the driver is crazy enough to put
all write requests on one queue and all barriers
on another one, how is the device supposed to ensure
ordering?

I agree here, in fact I misread Hannes's comment as "if a driver uses more than one queue it is responsibility of the driver to ensure strict request ordering". If you send requests to different queues, you know that those requests are independent. I don't think anything else is feasible in the virtio framework.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux