Re: [Android-virt] [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: KVM: Initial skeleton to compile KVM support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05.06.2011, at 19:56, Jan Kiszka wrote:

> On 2011-06-05 19:54, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> 
>> On 05.06.2011, at 19:48, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2011-06-05 19:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 05.06.2011, at 18:33, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 06/05/2011 07:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following. Are
>>>>>>>> you suggesting a new arch-generic interface? (Pardon my ignorance).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Using KVM_IRQ_LINE everywhere except s390, not just in x86 and ARM.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> An in-kernel MPIC implementation is coming for PPC, so I don't see any reason to switch from something that works now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Right, this is spilled milk.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does the ppc qemu implementation raise KVM_INTERRUPT solely from the vcpu thread?
>>>> 
>>>> Well, without iothread it used to obviously. Now that we have an iothread, it calls ioctl(KVM_INTERRUPT) from a separate thread. The code also doesn't forcefully wake up the vcpu thread, so yes, I think here's a chance for at least delaying interrupt delivery. Chances are pretty slim we don't get out of the vcpu thread at all :).
>>> 
>>> There are good chances to run into a deadlock when calling a per-vcpu
>>> IOCTL over a foreign context: calling thread holds qemu_mutex and blocks
>>> on kvm_mutex inside the kernel, target vcpu is running endless guest
>>> loop, holding kvm_mutex, all other qemu threads will sooner or later
>>> block on the global lock. That's at least one pattern you can get on x86
>>> (we had a few of such bugs in the past).
>> 
>> Any recommendations? Should we just signal the main thread when we want to inject an interrupt?
> 
> Yep. That's also what x86 does (when using user space irqchips).

Hrm, ok :). I guess the main reason we don't see major issues is that

  1) people don't use iothread too often yet - is it even enabled by default?
  2) the decrementor interrupt happens in-kernel, so timer interrupts still arrive properly


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux