On 06/05/2011 07:25 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> >> An additional advantage is that this is a vm ioctl, not a vcpu ioctl, so >> no need to interrupt the vcpu thread in userspace in order to queue an >> interrupt. Of course, it still happens in the kernel, but it's easier >> for userspace to implement its device model this way. > > So supporting this over existing archs would have some benefits as well, > though a bit smaller if in-kernel irqchip is already implemented. > Could you elaborate what you mean here? I'm not really following. Are you suggesting a new arch-generic interface? (Pardon my ignorance).
Using KVM_IRQ_LINE everywhere except s390, not just in x86 and ARM. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
