Re: [PATCH] kvm tools, ui: Optimize SDL updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I wrote up 2 virtio-fb implementations a while back and I still 
> believe it's a bad idea. Better implement QXL in kvm-tool, so work 
> doesn't get needlessly duplicated. If you really have to use virtio 
> for whatever reason (no PCI available), just write a small QXL over 
> virtio transport that allows you to reuse the protocol.
> 
> I really don't want to see people waste time on reinventing the 
> wheel over and over again.

Oh, we are just ignorantly blundering around trying to find a good 
solution! :-)

We are not trying to reimplement the wheel (at all), if you check we 
started with VNC GUI support which is as far from NIH as it gets! :-)

I didn't know about QXL but it looks interesting at first sight: a 
virtual GPU seen by the guest OS with Xorg support for it in the 
guest Xorg. But i do not see guest kernel framebuffer support for it 
- how does that aspect work, if one boots without Xorg, etc.?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux