RE: [PATCH 08/31] nVMX: Fix local_vcpus_link handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Avi Kivity [mailto:avi@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:37 PM
> 
> On 05/24/2011 02:30 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > >
> > >  We don't do that.  vcpu migration calls vcpu_clear() with interrupts
> > >  enabled, which then calls smp_call_function_single(), which calls
> > >  __vcpu_clear() with interrupts disabled.  vmclear_local_vcpus() is
> > >  called from interrupts disabled (and calls __vcpu_clear() directly).
> > >
> >
> > OK, that's clear to me now.
> 
> Are there still open issues about the patch?
> 
> (Nadav, please post patches in the future in new threads so they're
> easier to find)
> 

I'm fine with this patch except that Nadav needs to clarify the comment
in __loaded_vmcs_clear (regarding to 'cpu migration' and 'cpu offline' part
which I replied in another mail)

Thanks
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux