On 19.05.2011, at 07:22, Paul Mackerras wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 02:42:08PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 05/17/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> >>>> What would be the path for these patches to get upstream? Would this >>>> stuff normally go through Avi's tree? There is a bit of a >>>> complication in that they are based on Ben's next branch. Would Avi >>>> pull Ben's next branch, or would they go in via Ben's tree? >>> >>> Usually the ppc tree gets merged into Avi's tree and goes on from >>> there. When we have interdependencies, we can certainly do it >>> differently though. We can also shove them through Ben's tree this >>> time around, as there are more dependencies on ppc code than KVM >>> code. >>> >> >> Yes, both options are fine. If it goes through kvm.git I can merge >> Ben's tree (provided it is append-only) and apply the kvm-ppc >> patches on top. > > OK, the easiest thing is for them to go via Ben's tree, I think, since > they depend so much on other stuff in Ben's tree. > > Alex, could you give Ben an acked-by for patches 1-8 of the series? > There haven't been any changes requested for them. Let me give them a spin on a G5, so I can at least verify nothing breaks ;). I'll hopefully get to this before next week. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
