On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 02:42:08PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/17/2011 02:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> > >> What would be the path for these patches to get upstream? Would this > >> stuff normally go through Avi's tree? There is a bit of a > >> complication in that they are based on Ben's next branch. Would Avi > >> pull Ben's next branch, or would they go in via Ben's tree? > > > >Usually the ppc tree gets merged into Avi's tree and goes on from > >there. When we have interdependencies, we can certainly do it > >differently though. We can also shove them through Ben's tree this > >time around, as there are more dependencies on ppc code than KVM > >code. > > > > Yes, both options are fine. If it goes through kvm.git I can merge > Ben's tree (provided it is append-only) and apply the kvm-ppc > patches on top. OK, the easiest thing is for them to go via Ben's tree, I think, since they depend so much on other stuff in Ben's tree. Alex, could you give Ben an acked-by for patches 1-8 of the series? There haven't been any changes requested for them. Thanks, Paul. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
