Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM in-guest performance monitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/12/2011 05:37 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:

I've considered something similar for mmio - use hypercalls for ordinary mmio to avoid calling into the emulator - but virtio uses pio which isn't emulated and we don't have massive consumers of mmio (except perhaps hpet).

Say,

enum {
   KVM_OP_MMIO_READ = 1,
   KVM_OP_MMIO_WRITE = 2,
   KVM_OP_PIO_READ = 3,
   KVM_OP_PIO_WRITE = 4,
   KVM_OP_MSR_READ = 5,
   KVM_OP_MSR_WRITE = 6,
   KVM_OP_HLT = 7, /* so we can program the apic timer and sleep */
}

struct kvm_batch_op {
    u8 op;
    u8 result;
    u8 size;
    u8 reserved[5];
    u64 address;
    u64 data;
};

int kvm_batch(int nr, u64 kvm_batch_op_phys);

This is really repeating Xen PV though (different ops), not sure it's worth the intrusiveness.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux