On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:47:51AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-05-12 11:33, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Anyway, I thought about a paravirt-approach instead of implementing a > > real PMU... But there are certainly good reasons for both. > > Paravirt is taking away the pressure from CPU vendors to do their virt > extensions properly - and doesn't help with unmodifiable OSes. Seriously, I think such decisions should be technical only and not political like that. The losers of such political decisions are always the users because they don't get useful features that are technical possible. Regards, Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
