On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:22:57PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:32:26AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Of course, if we get a patch soon no one will ever see the > > >> regression so > > >> > we can apply the series. > > >> > > >> I will still require the usual testing and merging round via upstream > > >> and back. Not sure when I'll be able to work on it, probably not the > > >> next days. > > > > > > If you can do it within a couple of weeks or so that should be fine. > > > > > > > We'll see, but I still do not share your concern regarding future > > regressions when removing the fragile reset code. > > > Why do we rely on userspace to properly reset kernel component anyway? In general its required that userspace properly sets (some of) the parameters of emulated hardware, including on reset. > We should introduce cpu/lapic/ioapic/pit/pic resets ASAP. Thats done through userspace via ioctls, don't get your point? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
