On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:58:27PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/05/2011 02:22 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> > >> We'll see, but I still do not share your concern regarding future > >> regressions when removing the fragile reset code. > >> > >Why do we rely on userspace to properly reset kernel component anyway? > >We should introduce cpu/lapic/ioapic/pit/pic resets ASAP. > > We should, but we'll always have to deal with kernels that don't > have reset ioctls. > s/always/for quite a while/. Unfortunately yes. Unless we put qemu in the kernel tree and will release them in lock steps of course :) -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
