On 2011-04-27 16:29, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/27/2011 05:04 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> >>> I put kvm_msix_message in pci.h to avoid having every pci device pull in kvm.h >>> is anything wrong with that? Maybe just rename it to make it generic >>> for msi and leave if where it is. >> >> kvm.h shall provide kvm related types, not some unrelated header. That's >> even more important with MSI support for non-PCI devices (aka HPET). > > We could have an MSIMessage type that abstracts the general facility, > and let it embed a KVMMsiMessage that contains just the gsi. Yes, likely also useful for generic MSI delivery services that bypass stl_phys. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html