Re: PCI Passthrough, error: The driver 'pci-stub' is occupying your device 0000:08:06.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * James Neave (roboj1m@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> OK, here's my latest dmesg with amd_iommu_dump and debug with no quiet
>> http://pastebin.com/JxEwvqRA
>
> Yeah, that's what I expected:
>
> [ Â Â0.724403] AMD-Vi: Â DEV_ALIAS_RANGE Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â devid: 08:00.0 flags: 00 devid_to: 00:14.4
> [ Â Â0.724439] AMD-Vi: Â DEV_RANGE_END Â Â Â Â Â devid: 08:1f.7
>
> That basically says 08:00.0 - 08:1f.7 will show up as 00:14.4 (and
> should all go into same iommu domain).
>
>> I've just figured out a sequence of "echo DEV > PATH" commands to call
>> for 14.4 gets me past the "claimed by pci-stub" error and gets me to
>> the "failed to assign IRQ" error.
>> I'm going to narrow down the required sequence and then post it.
>
> Kind of afraid to ask, but does it include:
>
> (assuming 1002 4384 is the pci to pci bridge)
> echo 1002 4384 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pci-stub/new_id
> echo 0000:00:14.4 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pci-stub/unbind
>
> (this has the side effect of detaching the bridge from its domain)
>
> thanks,
> -chris
>

Exact sequence is:

echo "1002 4384" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/pci-stub/new_id
echo "0000:00:14.4" > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:14.4/driver/unbind

I take it this is a bad thing then?

> I assume this means that 00:14.4 is still left claimed by pci-stub?

Yes

> How are you determining this?  The lspci paste above has pci-stub for all
> of them.  The easiest thing might be to start with manually disabling
> host driver and reassigning pci-stub to: 00:14.4, 08: 06.2,3 and 0e.0
> Then giving the guest only 08:06.1.

I determined it by being half asleep and not reading it properly... >.<
You're right, all 5 devices were using pci-stub

>> libvirtError: this function is not supported by the connection driver:
>> Unable to reset PCI device 0000:00:14.4: no FLR, PM reset or bus reset
>> available

> Right, libvirt is more restrictive than qemu-kvm (forgot you were using
> libvirt here).

What does that libvirt error mean? I can't find a definition.
Am I limiting myself by using libvirt? Would not using it help and how
would I go about not using it?

> Trouble now is that
> with shared IRQ we don't have a good way to handle that right now.

Game over then?
I've tried assigning the USB devices before, I couldn't do it because
qemu doesn't support USB2 devices.
I don't really understand where this IRQ conflict is, the firewire and
the USB2 device share IRQ22 but I'm assigning them both to the VM?
Is that still a problem?
I don't suppose there's any way to change which IRQ they use in the
BIOS or with a command is there?

I don't know if it means anything but this page:

http://linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Hauppauge_WinTV-HVR-2200

Has the lspci output for the HVR-2200 which mentions MSI and IRQ255.
My knowledge it very limited on this subject so I don't know if that's
meaningless looking at the output from another person's lspci.

Anything left to try?

Regardless, many thanks for your help,

James.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux