Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:53:36PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > kvm_cpu_exec/kvm_run, and start wondering "What needs to be done to
> > upstream so that qemu-kvm could use that implementation?". If they
> > differ, the reasons need to be understood and patched away, either by
> > fixing/enhancing upstream or simplifying qemu-kvm. Once the upstream
> > changes are merged back, a qemu-kvm patch is posted to switch to that
> > version.
> 
> while I'm not an expert in that area I really like you're approach.  I'd
> really prefer to let you finish up all the major work that way before
> starting massive revamping like the glib main loop.  Resolving the
> qemu/qemu-kvm schisma surely is more important for the overall project
> than rewriting existing functionality to look a little nicer.

Agree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux