On 01/11/2011 03:54 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 03:53:08PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/11/2011 03:30 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >+ > >+asm ( > >+ ".global resume_start\n" > >+ ".global resume_end\n" > >+ ".code16\n" > >+ "resume_start:\n" > >+ "mov 0x0, %eax\n" > >+ "mov $0xf4, %dx\n" > >+ "out %eax, %dx\n" > >+ "1: hlt\n" > >+ "jmp 1b\n" > >+ "resume_end:\n" > >+#ifdef __i386__ > >+ ".code32\n" > >+#else > >+ ".code64\n" > >+#endif > >+ ); > > Is this a kvm unit test or a qemu unit test? > Both? Is this a bad thing?
We may want to move non-kvm tests to qemu.git. Though all of the non-api tests work equally for qemu and kvm.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
