Re: [RFC 0/4] KVM in-kernel PM Timer implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/14/10 12:49, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> But that doesn't tell you what the impact is in real world workloads. 
> Before we start pushing all device emulation into the kernel, we need to
> quantify how often gettimeofday() is really called in real workloads.

The workload that inspired that example program at its current max load
calls gtod upwards of 1000 times per second. The overhead of
gettimeofday was the biggest factor when comparing performance to bare
metal and esx. That's why I wrote the test program --- boils a complex
product/program to a single system call.

David

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
>> What's the relative speed of the in-kernel pmtimer compared to the PIT?
>>
>> David
>>    
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux