On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 17:22 +0100, LukÃÅ Doktor wrote: > Dne 23.11.2010 03:30, Amos Kong napsal(a): > > ----- "JiÅÃ Åupka"<jzupka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> --- > > > > After loading your this patch, virtio_console also could not work with older python. > > > > Something are not fixed, such as: > > "return True if self.failed> 0 else False" > > "PASS"if result[0] else "FAIL" > > ... > > > > I'm testing with 'Python 2.4.3' > > Hi, > > this fixes only the GUEST (virtio_guest.py) side of the virtio_console > test. (tested with python 2.4.3 and 2.4.6) > > It's possible to fix the host side too but distributions which supports > only python 2.4 usually supports older versions of KVM without the > '-device' option we use in the HOST side of the test for creating the > devices. This change would only make the code less readable with minimal > income. > > Anyway if there's a real demand, we can fix the HOST side too. The point here is that we're under a larger project, autotest, which strives to keep py 2.4 compatibility. So yes, we're going to need to fix the host side too. However, I'd like to point out that you guys have done an excellent job with the virtio_console test, great code quality. Cheers, Lucas > Cheers, > LukÃÅ > > > >> def close(self, file): > >> @@ -339,7 +341,7 @@ class VirtioGuest: > >> if descriptor != None: > > >> -- > >> 1.7.3.2 > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
