On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:18:06PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >But for PV devices, we can be loose in how we define the way the > >devices interact with the rest of the system. For instance, we > >can say that virtio-pci devices are directly connected to RAM and > >do not go through the memory controllers. That means we could get > >stable mappings of the virtio ring. > > That wouldn't work once we have an iommu and start to assign them to > nested guests. Yea. Not sure whether I'm worried about that though. Mixing in all the problems inherent in nested virt, PV and assigned devices seems especially masochistic. > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
