Hi,
register_ioport_write (s->port, 1, 1, gus_writeb, s);
register_ioport_write (s->port, 1, 2, gus_writew, s);
+ isa_init_ioport_range(dev, s->port, 2);
register_ioport_read ((s->port + 0x100)& 0xf00, 1, 1, gus_readb, s);
register_ioport_read ((s->port + 0x100)& 0xf00, 1, 2, gus_readw, s);
+ isa_init_ioport_range(dev, (s->port + 0x100)& 0xf00, 2);
register_ioport_write (s->port + 6, 10, 1, gus_writeb, s);
register_ioport_write (s->port + 6, 10, 2, gus_writew, s);
register_ioport_read (s->port + 6, 10, 1, gus_readb, s);
register_ioport_read (s->port + 6, 10, 2, gus_readw, s);
+ isa_init_ioport_range(dev, s->port + 6, 10);
register_ioport_write (s->port + 0x100, 8, 1, gus_writeb, s);
register_ioport_write (s->port + 0x100, 8, 2, gus_writew, s);
register_ioport_read (s->port + 0x100, 8, 1, gus_readb, s);
register_ioport_read (s->port + 0x100, 8, 2, gus_readw, s);
+ isa_init_ioport_range(dev, s->port + 0x100, 8);
Seeing all the duplication here and elsewhere ...
How about moving the register_ioport_{read,write} calls into
isa_init_ioport_range() ?
cheers,
Gerd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html