On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:22:21 -0500 Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/01/2010 02:20 PM, Huang Ying wrote: > > Yes. As general interface, it may not work so well, but as test > > interface, it works quite well and useful. > > > > Do we have any mechanism to add a test only interface? No. We're likely going to introduce a new namespace for that in the near future, but only for QMP. Is this command supposed to be useful for applications or is it primary designed for (human) debugging? > I'd like to see what Luiz/Markus think but definitely only a human > monitor interface and probably prefix the command with a 'x-' prefix to > indicate that it's not a supported interface. Yes, I agree on having only the human interface but I'm not sure about prexing it with 'x-'. I think new HMP commands should be declared unstable by default starting with 0.14. > The documentation should be very clear about the limitations of the > interface and the intended use-case. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > Best Regards, > > Huang Ying > > > > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
