Re: [v2 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 10/06/2010 07:04:31 PM:

> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:33:07PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> > For 1 TCP netperf, I ran 7 iterations and summed it. Explanation
> > for degradation for 1 stream case:
>
> I thought about possible RX/TX contention reasons, and I realized that
> we get/put the mm counter all the time.  So I write the following: I
> haven't seen any performance gain from this in a single queue case, but
> maybe this will help multiqueue?

Sorry for the delay, I was sick last couple of days. The results
with your patch are (%'s over original code):

Code               BW%       CPU%       RemoteCPU
MQ     (#txq=16)   31.4%     38.42%     6.41%
MQ+MST (#txq=16)   28.3%     18.9%      -10.77%

The patch helps CPU utilization but didn't help single stream
drop.

Thanks,

- KK

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux