"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 10/06/2010 07:04:31 PM: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > 10/06/2010 07:04 PM > > To > > Krishna Kumar2/India/IBM@IBMIN > > cc > > rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > arnd@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, avi@xxxxxxxxxx, anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject > > Re: [v2 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:33:07PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote: > > For 1 TCP netperf, I ran 7 iterations and summed it. Explanation > > for degradation for 1 stream case: > > I thought about possible RX/TX contention reasons, and I realized that > we get/put the mm counter all the time. So I write the following: I > haven't seen any performance gain from this in a single queue case, but > maybe this will help multiqueue? Great! I am on vacation tomorrow, but will test with this patch tomorrow night. Thanks, - KK -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
