09.10.2010 02:06, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: [] >>>> commit bd59fc8ff95126f27b7a0df1b6cc602aa428812d >>>> Author: Zachary Amsden<zamsden@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Date: Thu Aug 19 22:07:26 2010 -1000 [] >>> commit aad07c4f92bae2edaa42bcef84c2afdd0d082458 >>> Author: Zachary Amsden<zamsden@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Thu Aug 19 22:07:19 2010 -1000 Um. Now I'm completely confused. The two mentioned patches, just like most of the larger series from Zachary Amsden, are for _host_ kernel, right? The two backports: arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +- kvm/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +- that's for _host_, not guest... For some reason I tried several patches like the two here for _guest_, not for host. No doubt there were no difference in the results. For host, things are quite different. While 2.6.32 is still very important there, it's not _that_ important as for guest. As far as I can see, most of these can be dealt with by re-loading kvm modules. Let me try these and some of the earlier patches... Oh well... Confusion, confusion, confusion.... :) /mjt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
