Re: 2.6.35-rc1 regression with pvclock and smp guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



29.09.2010 13:17, Michael Tokarev ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> 29.09.2010 12:28, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>  On 08/03/2010 12:35 AM, Arjan Koers wrote:
>>> I don't think that pvclock_clocksource_read is receiving
>>> completely random uninitialized data. The values in shadow
>>> are wrong, but could be interpreted as valid data
>>> (shadow.tsc_to_nsec_mul = b6dc43b6, shadow.tsc_shift = ffffffff,
>>> shadow.flags = 0 and shadow.version is always even).
>>>
>>> I've attached the printk patches for 2.6.34.1 and 2.6.35, in case
>>> anyone needs them...
[]
> Avi, this is definitely a -stable material, for 2.6.32 (longterm
> stable) and 2.6.35.

Er. Please excuse me for the misinformation.  It is _not_ for 2.6.32
ofcourse.

/mjt

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux