Re: 2.6.35-rc1 regression with pvclock and smp guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/31/2010 06:36 AM, Arjan Koers wrote:
On 2010-07-31 13:53, Arjan Koers wrote:
The kernel boots successfully when CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME is not set.

The problem occurs when this message is printed:

[    0.016000] kvm-clock: cpu 1, msr 0:1511c01, secondary cpu clock

When I disable that printk, the kernel boots with
CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvmclock.c
@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ static int kvm_register_clock(char *txt)
  	int low, high;
  	low = (int)__pa(&per_cpu(hv_clock, cpu)) | 1;
  	high = ((u64)__pa(&per_cpu(hv_clock, cpu))>>  32);
-	printk(KERN_INFO "kvm-clock: cpu %d, msr %x:%x, %s\n",
-	       cpu, high, low, txt);
+	/*printk(KERN_INFO "kvm-clock: cpu %d, msr %x:%x, %s\n",
+	       cpu, high, low, txt);*/

  	return native_write_msr_safe(msr_kvm_system_time, low, high);
  }

So the problem appears to be that the clock of the second CPU
is used too soon (or that clock setup should finish earlier).

That's almost hilarious. The printk from setting up the kvm clock is invoking the kvm clock before it is setup.

There's no reason other printks couldn't do the same thing, however. I think it's safest to keep an initialized flag and check for it before attempting to return a meaningful value.

Zach
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux