Thanks for your information Daniel On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:58:46PM +0530, Rajiv Rajaian wrote: >> Thanks for your kind information Daniel. >> Consider this scenario >> VM1(144.68.100.1) and VM2(144.68.100.2) running on Host1(10.2.0.20) >> and Host2(10.2.0.30) respectively. Is it possible to access the VM1 >> and VM2 from Host3(10.2.0.100). How to add a static route for this >> scenario?? Here I don't need separate subnets for VMs. >> All VMs should be in same subnet ie 144.68.100.0/255.255.255.0 >> Is there any way to configure this ?? > > No, in the setup libvirt does, each host must have a separate subnet. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| > |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
