On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:58:46PM +0530, Rajiv Rajaian wrote: > Thanks for your kind information Daniel. > Consider this scenario > VM1(144.68.100.1) and VM2(144.68.100.2) running on Host1(10.2.0.20) > and Host2(10.2.0.30) respectively. Is it possible to access the VM1 > and VM2 from Host3(10.2.0.100). How to add a static route for this > scenario?? Here I don't need separate subnets for VMs. > All VMs should be in same subnet ie 144.68.100.0/255.255.255.0 > Is there any way to configure this ?? No, in the setup libvirt does, each host must have a separate subnet. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://deltacloud.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
