On 09/12/2010 05:31 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 09/12/2010 01:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/10/2010 10:48 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I agree, is there any reason not to enable compiling less into the
binary?
There are folks interested in eliminating as much as possible to
reduce
the attack surface and auditing requirements, for example.
It's not a bad idea, it's just that what --disable-cpu-emulation
does is evil. Being that I wrote the implementation, I'm quite
confident in declare it as such :-)
Oh, I thought you were against the idea in itself for some reason.
I'll patch it for 0.13, but any ideas on how it should be rework for
master?
Glauber's old Accel interface was close to the right approach. We
need to abstract the exec.c interfaces to use a function pointer table
and have a TCG and KVM implementation. The function pointer tables
can then be registered by a module_init() and we can simply not
include the kvm or TCG files are build time to disable the functionality.
Yes, I remember it now.
Glauber, can you bring those patches back from the land of the dead?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
