On 11.09.2010, at 16:42, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:38:51PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> I am not sure that I am the right person to do such an invasive change. >>> At least not in this patch-set. I could think of removing SVM from the >>> qemu64 definition and add it again in the TCG specific path. >> >> It's not an invasive change and IMHO the only correct one. I'm not >> even sure why it's not done yet - after all the reason for the kvm* >> cpu types is exactly that. Please just add it as an early patch in >> your series. > > Okay, if you say its ok I will change it. But if anyone comes to me with > regressions I will send them straight to you :-P Feel free to do so :). We really need to have a different default CPU for "migration safe KVM" and "This is what TCG can emulate". They don't match semantically. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
