On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 04:38:51PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > I am not sure that I am the right person to do such an invasive change. > > At least not in this patch-set. I could think of removing SVM from the > > qemu64 definition and add it again in the TCG specific path. > > It's not an invasive change and IMHO the only correct one. I'm not > even sure why it's not done yet - after all the reason for the kvm* > cpu types is exactly that. Please just add it as an early patch in > your series. Okay, if you say its ok I will change it. But if anyone comes to me with regressions I will send them straight to you :-P Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
