On 09/07/2010 08:25 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:21:32AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 09/06/2010 11:20 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Upstream code is equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti<mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Index: qemu-kvm/cpus.c
===================================================================
--- qemu-kvm.orig/cpus.c
+++ qemu-kvm/cpus.c
@@ -290,11 +290,6 @@ void qemu_notify_event(void)
{
CPUState *env = cpu_single_env;
- if (kvm_enabled()) {
- qemu_kvm_notify_work();
- return;
- }
-
qemu_event_increment ();
if (env) {
cpu_exit(env);
qemu_event_increment() is indeed equivalent, but what about the
rest? Are we guaranteed that cpu_single_env == NULL?
No, its not NULL. But env->current is, so its fine.
Ok, thanks.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html