On 07.09.2010, at 16:12, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:51:33AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 09/07/2010 03:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>> I think we should get rid of kvm_nested and -enable-nesting. Instead, we should enable the SVM bit in the "host" and "qemu64" cpu types, but not in "kvm64". This way users are safe to not use nested svm, but can choose to do so if they like. >>> >>> Also, it should be possible to do something like -cpu kvm64,flags=+svm. Without having to mess with -enable-nesting. >> >> I agree, -enable-nesting is redundant with -cpu ,+svm. > > This patchset makes -enable-nesting pratically a synonym for -cpu ,+svm. > So we can safely remove -enable-nesting in the future. Oh, because this is for qemu-kvm. Uh - how about a nice little patch that makes things work in qemu.git, leave out the -enable-nesting piece and just keep the -enable-nesting backwards compat patch in qemu-kvm.git - or maybe even remove it there. Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
