On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:46:01PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/23/2010 04:33 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:06:16PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>Use the new byte/word dual opcode decode. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity<avi@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>--- > >> arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 ++---- > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > >>index c61f73d..6cb5663 100644 > >>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > >>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c > >>@@ -2464,13 +2464,11 @@ static struct opcode opcode_table[256] = { > >> N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, > >> /* 0xE0 - 0xE7 */ > >> X3(D(SrcImmByte)), N, > >>- D(ByteOp | SrcImmUByte | DstAcc), D(SrcImmUByte | DstAcc), > >>- D(ByteOp | SrcAcc | DstImmUByte), D(SrcAcc | DstImmUByte), > >>+ D2bv(SrcImmUByte | DstAcc), D2bv(SrcAcc | DstImmUByte), > >> /* 0xE8 - 0xEF */ > >> D(SrcImm | Stack), D(SrcImm | ImplicitOps), > >> D(SrcImmFAddr | No64), D(SrcImmByte | ImplicitOps), > >>- D(SrcNone | ByteOp | DstAcc), D(SrcNone | DstAcc), > >>- D(ByteOp | SrcAcc | ImplicitOps), D(SrcAcc | ImplicitOps), > >>+ D2bv(SrcNone | DstAcc), D2bv(SrcAcc | ImplicitOps), > >> /* 0xF0 - 0xF7 */ > >> N, N, N, N, > >> D(ImplicitOps | Priv), D(ImplicitOps), G(ByteOp, group3), G(0, group3), > >Hmm. I actually have a patch that makes encoding of those to be different. > > > >=== > > Some instructions has 32 bit operand even in long mode. > > > > Decode this through decode table instead of during instruction > > emulation. > > > > This can still work. > > >@@ -2750,6 +2751,9 @@ done_prefixes: > > c->op_bytes = 4; > > } > > > >+ if (mode == X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64&& (c->d& Op32in64)) > >+ c->op_bytes = 4; > > Just check that it isn't a ByteOp. > Hmm. It seams that even that is not needed. We have c->dst.bytes = (c->d & ByteOp) ? 1 : c->op_bytes; everywhere. > btw, shouldn't that be > > if (c->op_bytes == 8 && (c->d & Op32in64)) > > ? to account for c->op_bytes = 2 initially. > > Initially it will be 4 in X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64, but it may be overridden to 2, so yes we should check c->op_bytes == 8 not X86EMUL_MODE_PROT64. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html