Re: KVM Processor cache size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 08/03/2010 02:40 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:

Yes, but virtualization is not supposed to expose the underlying hardware. The vendor_id bit is a harder problem that I'm willing to ignore in this discussion. I understand why we have to do this today.

Today and forever... unless one of the processor vendors starts supporting the other's fast system call instructions on all modes.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux