Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for July 27

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 27.07.2010 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori<anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  writes:
>>
>>    
>>> - any additional input on probed_raw?
>>>      
>> Isn't it a fait accompli?  I stopped providing input when commit
>> 79368c81 appeared.
>>    
> 
> No.  79368c81 was to close the security hole (and I do consider it a 
> security hole).  But as I mentioned on the list, I'm also not satisfied 
> with it and that's why I proposed probed_raw.  I was hoping to get a 
> little more input from those that objected to 79368c81 as to whether 
> probed_raw was more agreeable.

Actually I believe qraw is less agreeable. It just too much magic. You
wouldn't expect that your raw images are turned into some other format
that you can't mount or use with any other program any more.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux