Re: KVM call agenda for July 27

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguori<anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>  writes:

- any additional input on probed_raw?
Isn't it a fait accompli?  I stopped providing input when commit
79368c81 appeared.

No. 79368c81 was to close the security hole (and I do consider it a security hole). But as I mentioned on the list, I'm also not satisfied with it and that's why I proposed probed_raw. I was hoping to get a little more input from those that objected to 79368c81 as to whether probed_raw was more agreeable.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux