On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > +Yury and Rasmus > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > The header clearly states that it does not want to be included directly, > > I definitely don't object to the KVM change, but the if y'all expect developers > to actually honor the "rule", it needs to have teeth. As evidenced by a similar > rule in arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h that also gets ignored, an #error that's > buried under an include guard and triggers on a macro that's never #undef'd is > quite useless. To follow up, I am willing to do the proposed change. But before sending this out, it would be nice if the existing broken includes would be fixed. So, can this patch be applied first?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
