[ kvm-Bugs-1841658 ] OpenSolaris 64bit panic with kvm-54

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bugs item #1841658, was opened at 2007-11-30 13:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jessorensen
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1841658&group_id=180599

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 3
Private: No
Submitted By: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon (carenas)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: OpenSolaris 64bit panic with kvm-54

Initial Comment:
Wouldn't mark it as a regression per-se as vanilla kvm-53 wouldn't work (because of the need for IDE patches to get it to run/install), but vanilla kvm-54 or kvm-54 + the same patches added to kvm-53 and including pre-kvm-55 patches like 71be592a14aa8d127315b2c47bf83cc0d810a341 wouldn't work.

The panic is observed in kvm-54 (--no-kvm runs ok, and --no-kvm-irqchip doesn't help) while running nexenta OpenSolaris alpha 7 or beta 1 (other OpenSolaris distributions most likely affected as well) and with the following trace :

panic[cpu0]/thread=fffffffec2de2260: BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ffffff0001735f30 addr=0 occurred in module "unix" due to a NULL pointer dereference

dbus: #pf Page fault
Bad kernel fault at addr=0x0
pid=278, pc=0xfffffffffb83c189, sp=0xffffff0001736028, eflags=0x10246
cr0: 80050033<pg,wp,ne,et,mp,pe> cr4: 6b8<xmme,fxsr,pge,pae,pse,de>
cr2: 0 cr3: 7dc4000 cr8: 0
        rdi:                0 rsi: fffffffec0025630 rdx: fffffffec2de2260
        rcx:            10000  r8: fffffffec0025630  r9:                3
        rax:                0 rbx:                0 rbp: ffffff0001736080
        r10:                1 r11: fffffffec1ad31e0 r12:                0
        r13: fffffffec0025680 r14: c002548800000000 r15:                0
        fsb:                0 gsb: fffffffffbc26ef0  ds:               4b
         es:               4b  fs:                0  gs:              1c3
        trp:                e err:                0 rip: fffffffffb83c189
         cs:               30 rfl:            10246 rsp: ffffff0001736028
         ss:               38

ffffff0001735e10 unix:die+c8 ()
ffffff0001735f20 unix:trap+135b ()
ffffff0001735f30 unix:cmntrap+e9 ()
ffffff0001736080 unix:mutex_exit+9 ()
ffffff00017360c0 genunix:kmem_alloc+88 ()
ffffff0001736110 zfs:zio_push_transform+3a ()
ffffff0001736190 zfs:zio_create+256 ()
ffffff0001736240 zfs:zio_vdev_child_io+97 ()
ffffff0001736320 zfs:vdev_cache_read+182 ()
ffffff0001736370 zfs:vdev_disk_io_start+41 ()
ffffff0001736390 zfs:vdev_io_start+1d ()
ffffff00017363d0 zfs:zio_vdev_io_start+123 ()
ffffff00017363f0 zfs:zio_next_stage_async+bb ()
ffffff0001736410 zfs:zio_nowait+11 ()
ffffff0001736450 zfs:vdev_mirror_io_start+18f ()
ffffff0001736490 zfs:zio_vdev_io_start+131 ()
ffffff00017364b0 zfs:zio_next_stage+b3 ()
ffffff00017364e0 zfs:zio_ready+10e ()
ffffff0001736500 zfs:zio_next_stage+b3 ()
ffffff0001736550 zfs:zio_wait_for_children+5d ()
ffffff0001736570 zfs:zio_wait_children_ready+20 ()
ffffff0001736590 zfs:zio_next_stage_async+bb ()
ffffff00017365b0 zfs:zio_nowait+11 ()
ffffff0001736660 zfs:arc_read+4e8 ()
ffffff0001736700 zfs:dbuf_read_impl+129 ()
ffffff0001736760 zfs:dbuf_read+c5 ()
ffffff0001736810 zfs:dmu_buf_hold_array_by_dnode+1c4 ()
ffffff00017368a0 zfs:dmu_buf_hold_array+74 ()
ffffff0001736930 zfs:dmu_read_uio+4d ()
ffffff00017369c0 zfs:zfs_read+15e ()
ffffff0001736a30 genunix:fop_read+69 ()
ffffff0001736af0 genunix:vn_rdwr+161 ()
ffffff0001736c70 genunix:gexec+11c ()
ffffff0001736e90 genunix:exec_common+41d ()
ffffff0001736ec0 genunix:exece+1b ()
ffffff0001736f10 unix:brand_sys_sysenter+1f2 ()

while running in a Gentoo Linux 2007.0 host with Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6320.

32bit OpenSolaris works fine

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Jes Sorensen (jessorensen)
Date: 2010-06-11 10:13

Message:
Hi,

I notice this one has been open for a long time. If you are still
interested in this, could you please try it against a recent KVM. If that
works fine, lets close this bug.

Thanks,
Jes


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon (carenas)
Date: 2007-12-01 13:25

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=36771
Originator: YES

kvm-53 also crashes randomly so it might not be a regression anyway, but
though it might be interesting to mention that kvm-54 + previously detailed
patches and also including fixes for is_long_mode as reported here :

 
http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08947.html

are able to run most versions of Solaris 10 64bit x86

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1841658&group_id=180599
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux