On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 04:31:25PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 10:33:31AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 10:38:28AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:59:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > +#define ASM_ANNOTATE(x) \ > > > > + "911:\n\t" \ > > > > + ".pushsection .discard.annotate,\"M\",@progbits,8\n\t" \ > > > > + ".long 911b - .\n\t" \ > > > > + ".long " __stringify(x) "\n\t" \ > > > > + ".popsection\n\t" > > > > > > Why mergeable and progbits? > > > > In order to get sh_entsize ? > > Is that a guess? If so, it's not very convincing as I don't see what > entsize would have to do with it. Oh, nevermind... I see it's a gas syntax issue. -- Josh
