Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] objtool: Generic annotation infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 10:33:31AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 10:38:28AM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:59:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > +#define ASM_ANNOTATE(x)						\
> > > +	"911:\n\t"						\
> > > +	".pushsection .discard.annotate,\"M\",@progbits,8\n\t"	\
> > > +	".long 911b - .\n\t"					\
> > > +	".long " __stringify(x) "\n\t"				\
> > > +	".popsection\n\t"
> > 
> > Why mergeable and progbits?
> 
> In order to get sh_entsize ?

Is that a guess?  If so, it's not very convincing as I don't see what
entsize would have to do with it.

-- 
Josh




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux