On 11/8/2024 4:18 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 02:29:03PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote: >> From the APIC architecture details in APM and SDM, I see these gaps are reserved > > What I actually meant here is whether SAVIC enablement is going to keep adding > more and more entries here so that it becomes practically *all* possible, each > spelled out explicitly. > Ah ok. My bad, I completely misread it and went too far. > But I went further in your patchset and it doesn't look like it so meh, ok. > Yes, the offsets layout I described was with respect to the complete series. Thanks for checking it. >> I would ask, does above reasoning convince you with the current switch-case layout >> or you want it to be range-based? > > That's fine, let's keep them like they are now and we can always revisit if > the list grows too ugly. > Sure, thanks! - Neeraj
