On 11/7/2024 7:58 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 09:02:16AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote: >> Intention of doing per reg is to be explicit about which registers >> are accessed from backing page, which from hv and which are not allowed >> access. As access (and their perms) are per-reg and not range-based, this >> made sense to me. Also, if ranges are used, I think 16-byte aligned >> checks are needed for the range. If using ranges looks more logical grouping >> here, I can update it as per the above range groupings. > > Is this list of registers going to remain or are we going to keep adding to > it so that the ranges become contiguous? >
