Re: [PATCH v4 05/13] iommu/vt-d: Prepare intel_iommu_set_dev_pasid() handle replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/11/6 16:02, Yi Liu wrote:
@@ -4329,24 +4368,17 @@ static int intel_iommu_set_dev_pasid(struct
iommu_domain *domain,
          ret = intel_pasid_setup_second_level(iommu, dmar_domain,
                               dev, pasid);
      if (ret)
-        goto out_unassign_tag;
+        goto out_remove_dev_pasid;

-    dev_pasid->dev = dev;
-    dev_pasid->pasid = pasid;
-    spin_lock_irqsave(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
-    list_add(&dev_pasid->link_domain, &dmar_domain->dev_pasids);
-    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dmar_domain->lock, flags);
+    domain_remove_dev_pasid(old, dev, pasid);

My preference is moving the check of non-NULL old out here.

@Baolu, how about your thought?

If we move the check out of this helper, there will be boilerplate code
in multiple places. Something like,

	if (old)
		domain_remove_dev_pasid(old, dev, pasid);

--
baolu




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux