On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:28:21PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > Ok got it - although that approach is not advisable in some cases for ex: when > the lock holder vcpu and lock acquired vcpu are scheduled on the same pcpu by > the hypervisor (which was experimented with in [1] where they foud a huge hit in > perf). 1. http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/13/464 - vatsa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
