Re: [PATCH] use unfair spinlock when running on hypervisor.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 07:52:28PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> We are running everything on NUMA (since all modern machines are now NUMA). 
>  At what scale do the issues become observable?

On Intel platforms it's visible starting with 4 sockets.

>
>>> I understand that reason and do not propose to get back to old spinlock
>>> on physical HW! But with virtualization performance hit is unbearable.
>>>      
>> Extreme unfairness can be unbearable too.
>>    
>
> Well, the question is what happens first.  In our experience, vcpu 
> overcommit is a lot more painful.  People will never see the NUMA 
> unfairness issue if they can't use kvm due to the vcpu overcommit problem.

You really have to address both, if you don't fix them both
users will eventually into one of them and be unhappy.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux