On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 12:39 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 2:30 AM Edgecombe, Rick P > <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Arh, yes this has details that are not relevant to the patch. > > > > Squashing it seems fine, but I wasn't sure about whether we actually needed > > this > > nr_premapped. It was one of the things we decided to punt a decision on in > > order > > to continue our debates on the list. So we need to pick up the debate again. > > I think keeping nr_premapped is safer. Heh, well it's not hurting anything except adding a small amount of complexity, so I guess we can cancel the debate. Thanks.
